The Second Contact by Asmund Skuterud's Party - Åsmund Skuterud (Koèju / Jazz in Khartoum) Case

This post is about the second conversation with a person in Asmund Skuterud  (Koèju / Jazz in Khartoum)'s Party, who claimed that he was not related to Koeju. However, we found that this individual is related to Åsmund Skuterud (Koèju / Jazz in Khartoum) in May 2017. The details are as following:

□■

On March 3-4, a Norwegian guy contacted us on Instagram, claiming our victim community is a harassment and bullying.

The individual used the same logic that the Vietnamese girl showed in our first conversation with his party. It was also a typical narcissistic flying monkey's reaction: "You are covering 1 half of the story with this "study"of yours."

Also, the individual blamed this victim community saying this is for "shaming", minimizing the victims' physical and psychological damages. 

The proper explanation about our purpose was provided to him considering his criticism. There are two points to explain: 

1. This blog is one-side story and filled only with bad stuff without having any conversation about it:

To the original research for one year, the extra data obtained from the nine interviews with the people involved has been added as a process of cross-checking. Also, the researcher tried to have conversation with Åsmund Skuterud three times and he has not tried to show any evidence that can deny the contents of this blog since October 2016.

2. The blog is not actually processing or helping with anything. This is just for shaming.

"The study (original participant observation)" is used for the base to support the purpose of blogging and revealed that Mr. Skuterud's gender violence, date rapes and a statutory rape in various countries. Additionally, the original observation encourages other victims' participation since speaking out about sexual violence / date rape is not easy for social pressure such as victim blaming. Sharing the victims' experience with others also helps their recovery.

The individual also claimed that we were using the name of Koeju to push the people to follow our agenda. It was a proper criticism so that we changed the Instagram account name to Koeju Victims.

In the final of the conversation he said, "I'm not related to any of the boys in Koeju, I like their music. So I don't know how you found me at all" denying the relationship with Koèju.

In May 2017, it was revealed that this was a false statement and he is clearly related to Åsmund Skuterud (Koèju / Jazz in Khartoum).

June 2017

Date Rape Testimony and Additional HPV Infection Report

DATE RAPE

On April 28, we received a serious e-mail from a courageous Taiwanese reader who was involved with Åsmund Skuterud (Koeju). In this email, she described how he coerced her to engage in sexual intercourse and how he abused her physically and emotionally by deception. Additionally, like the majority of our victims, she didn't get informed about his multiple sexual relationships and the risk of HPV infection. She didn't have any idea about what was happening until she found our blog.

We asked for advice of two people in Women's Studies field, who have working experience with sexual assault victims, in a very careful and cautious way to protect the victim's identity. They confirmed that this is a typical date rape case.

(We don't publish the details here since it could be a secondary victimization for her.)

□■

Here and now, we would like to encourage our survivors from the abusive relationship with Åsmund Skuterud (Koèju) to tell us their experience with a little bit of courage. Your identity will be strictly protected. Some victims in the countries, where an extreme rape culture still exists, may not realize their experience was a sexual violence or a rape. If you have any doubt about your experience with this guy Åsmund Skuterud, please don't hesitate to contact us. We have experienced people about sexual assault consulting.

SMEAR CAMPAIGN

In the same e-mail, this victim also testified about Åsmund Skuterud's smear campaign during the period between October and November 2016:
"He told me he spent a lot of time trying to calm down a friend in Columbia who had serious depression."

"He told me this friend was his ex-girlfriend, and was spreading rumors about him online."

This is another proof after the first testimony on his smear campaign.

ADDITIONAL HPV INFECTION (TYPE 16)

Recently, we also received  a report on the diagnosis of HPV type 16, that is highly related to cervical cancer. Until now we have four victims with high risk HPV (type 16, 52, 66) diagnosis.

We recommend that all the people who have been sexually involved with Åsmund Skuterud get a regular Pap Smear Test every 6 months, particularly those who had sexual contact with him after April 2016. Since this virus could be dormant for weeks or even for years, please be aware of the importance of the regular check-up if you already had contact with the infected person.

May 2017

On the Feedback to the Writing Methods of This Blog - Koèju Åsmund Skuterud Case

Some valuable feedback about the research/analysis methods of this blog have been arrived from one of our readers. Although our posts are casual writings taking an article format, I decided to share some parts of our email conversation to clear up my readers' doubts.  

Q: "I really appreciate you sharing something so private with me. I feel like I saw another side of you, vulnerable and a real human being, more than just the blog posts I saw online. Maybe you need to show this side to your other readers too. Not the private stories, just something more about how the experiences made you feel and the realization of him acting like he cared and wanted to be friends was just an act of trying to maintain a casual sexual relationship." (Mar 23, 2017)

"Sorry about the misunderstanding. I do think you are offering a lot of private information already. I guess what I meant was for you to share with us more about how the events made you feel." (Mar 30, 2017)

A: What you said is related to the method I chose to describe, that is "complete participant observation", Normally it should describe how the researcher felt in the interaction with the subject also, like you said. 

However, this method has an inherent limitation of qualitative investigation, to get objectivity. Also, I've already received some typical criticism of the narcissist's flying monkeys such as "This is just one-side story. There is another side of the story always.", even though I've not gotten any data from "the other side" yet.

Since the purpose of this blog is to let the people know the information and hopefully convince them to escape from the narcissistic relationship, not to get a methodological accuracy, I doubt if describing more the researcher's perspective would help to achieve our goal. 

Q: "In addition to the objectivity and to be more convincing, maybe it's better if you separate the extra data obtained from your eight interviews individually, instead of mixing them together? And the order is a little bit off, according to the timeline. Maybe you can fix it up and organize it in chronological order so it's easier to understand?" (Mar 30, 2017)

A: There is a limitation to write the collected interview data because of the interviewees' privacy. That's why I chose to add them on the original narrative analysis. As a member checking of the collected data in the participant observation, it would be great if I could write them chronologically and specifically, to get more objectivity in academical perspective. But the interviewees wanted to keep their identity in secret. So, the most important thing for me is keeping the promise even though I'm using ambiguous descriptive words on the post. 

There is a dilemma as always. I was also considering changing the organizing method because this article format is not easy to understand. I am fully aware that it is not completely organized yet. I will reorganize the posts soon when I have time to do it.

P.S. Also, one of my friends, who is in European History field, strongly criticized about the used lying detection theory for the analysis because it has a functionalist perspective and also took a skeptical stance toward the psychoanalytic approach. I value his view, however, the principal method of our post is a complete participant observation, that is a constructivist data collection method, and the post-observation with the obtained data from the interviews as a casual way of cross-checking provides the extra support for the original writing and helps to reduce the intervention caused by the researcher's perception during the analysis.

April 2017

P.S.2. I received another criticism from the same friend that points out "the objectivity" of the observation, since the researcher failed to have a proper emotional distance from the subject in the original observational period and chose the method of interviewing the people involved without direct observation on the subject's reaction in the post-observational period due to losing the rapport with him. However, we can't deny the selected strategy was effective to collect the information to increase the level of objectivity and helped to achieve our goal at a certain level.

July 2017

Another Message to Prove Åsmund Skuterud(Koèju)'s Risky and Irresponsible Behavior

On March 14, one of our brave Taiwanese readers, who was dating with Simon Matthew Valentine (aka Simon Matthew Jones-tyridal), sent us another message to support this blog.

The last part of her message is meaningful for us. The topic that we are talking about in this Åsmund Skuterud (Koèju) case is not only the problem of female body people, but also of all the people in the world to build the trustworthy relationship and society.

Everyone has a right to know the information to make their choice. But in this case, Åsmund Skuterud (Koèju) hided all the information, only to get what he wants, and put his sexual partners at STD/STI/cancerous risk. This is completely against the equality and he should give an apology to all the victims.

We really appreciate this great support for our blog. 

We were planning to deactivate our Instagram account on March 31 but we decided to postpone the closing date since It is discovered that there are more victims by Åsmund Skuterud (Koèju). 

March 14, 2017

Another Support from Our Reader - Koèju Åsmund Skuterud Case

A person who was involved with Åsmund Skuterud(Koèju) contacted me three times on January 24, February 7 and 9, 2017. She gave the information that Åsmund Skuterud (Koèju) sent a message in November, 2016 to ask if one of his friends had contacted her and said that the friend(referring to the author of this blog) was spreading a rumor because of depression.
(*The thing we need to remember is that what he has done doesn't be changed depending on the psychological status of the victim.)

Also the person confirmed that he said he got checked up when she was seeing him(*but it was false).

Feb 9 2017

Summary: 

In January and February 2017, several people who were involved with this guy Åsmund Skuterud contacted us. In February 2017, the author went to meet one of his teenager victims in person. All conversation was legally recorded.

October 2017